All posts tagged nexus

Wow.  I did NOT see that one coming!   Google just announced a new handset…

Anyone who read my prior article back on August 6th (“Should Google Stick to Search?“) will remember that I was not surprised that Google let the NexusOne die a quiet death — it was a bad move for Google to get into hardware handsets in the first place, putting them into square competition with their supposed “partners”, etc.   It sold poorly, and there were better handsets available from Google’s partners (HTC, Motorola etc.).   I thought giving up on the NexusOne was a smart move in the wake of a bad one.   Then this.

I am completely befuddled.  Was this the plan the entire time?  Who gives up on a device when another is already in the wings?  No, you keep pushing and promoting and building marketshare and you heavily tout that the next version is coming.  Witness the iPhone 4 “Antennaegate”.   Apple worked to address the issue best as they could, giving rubber bumpers for free until modified, slipstreamed versions of the hardware with tweaks could reach shelves, etc.  And in the meantime they’re already heavily into iPhone 5 development.   Who drops a major new product (first of its kind for Google), leaves a half-year void, then announces a follow-up?   This is very bizarre.

I cannot help wonder if this was on purpose, or if Google back-tracked on their backtrack after the fact?

I have no opinions at this point, merely awe and confusion.  This will be interesting to watch unfold!

UPDATE: More of the details are coming out now.  This phone was developed in conjunction with Samsung and is being bundled specifically and only with T-Mobil and sold via exactly one retail location: Best Buy.   So this is a completely different approach than Google took with the NexusOne where they tried to sidestep everyone and sell direct and produce their own brand of phone.  They obviously are stepping up their animosity with Apple and are taking every shot that they can between the phone and the new Google Bookstore that was announced today as well.  It will be very interesting to see how this all plays out over the next year or so.  I think consumers win regardless.  The only real loser will be Amazon on the bookstore side.

Well, today I saw an interesting blog post quietly slide by, almost unnoticed.  Google waved “Bye, Bye” to Google Wave.

This comes fairly close on the heels of another similar non-announcement: Google quietly killed its heralded Nexus One smartphone.

These two back-to-back dismal outings brought to mind a bevy of other non-starters by Google as well, such as the Orkut social network,  GoogleTalk (while Skype, AIM and Yahoo! IM flourish, does anyone actually use GoogleTalk as their primary IM software?  I certainly don’t know anyone who does), the municipal WiFi projects, and so forth.

I have somewhat mixed feelings on this.  On the one hand, I do understand the desire to “extend the brand” and get into other related markets.  Certainly Apple has done well with it’s iPod line of MP3 players.  They created a device that integrates well with its line of personal computer hardware and software for a seemless experience and now, years later, it’s a major bohemoth in the music industry.  Mp3 Players begat phones with iPods integrated, and so forth.  And it all works together as a single ecosystem to drive the popularity of its core computing business.  Indeed, Apple has seen it’s PC market share skyrocket in recent years as a result.  It’s the old “…as the pond rises, so do all boats” concept that I personally believe in very strongly.

However, extending the brand into related areas is one thing.  Jumping feet-first into entirely new areas that are NOT related to one’s core competencies is a whole other thing.

Google’s introduction of GMail made sense to me.  At it’s core, it’s related to search.  They didn’t necessarily pioneer anything revolutionary — web based email (and free at that) had existed for nearly 10 years before.  Witness Hotmail.    But they added AJAX-y goodness, made storage virtually unlimited, and then integrated their Google Search magic to make searching, sorting and finding stuff in your massive inbox very fast, easy and intuitive.  And that made sense.   Creating cell phone hardware?  Not so much.

Before all the Android fans start harping on me, I must note parenthetically that I “got” the concept of Android as a Google project.  It’s Google’s attempt to extend its brand to mobile platforms and lock itself in as the provider of choice for search on mobile platforms.  I get that.  (And by the way — it’s not like Google “created” Android from the ground up in quite the way neophytes might think.  It’s an open source, Linux-based OS that they polished and retrofitted to a mobile OS, much like making a new, customized Linux distribution).  But the leap to hardware and online stores, etc. is a whole other thing.

So on the one hand, Google has pioneered some newer technologies, brought awareness and popularity to certain methodologies (eg. AJAX), and has raised the bar for the rest of the tech industry.  It’s not necessarily a bad thing that a massively profitable, multi-billion dollar corporation is willing to throw money at R&D just to “see what happens”, with results going to the benefit of the likes of you and me.  [Click here to see a longer laundry list of their "Google Labs" products and technologies.]

However, from a business perspective, I can’t help but feel that Google should be sticking to its core competency (i.e. Search), then radiate out from there.  All of these wild ventures into completely new and unrelated territories is a bit scattered.  Up until now, Google was able to manage its reputation pretty well and these side projects were more like individual employee’s little pet projects and R&D stuff, and released into the wild for the rest of us to toy with and experiment.    But in the past year or two Google has really gotten behind some of these projects in a huge, huge way and trumpeted them as the next coming.   And they’ve taken quite a few hits.   While they are the 800lb Gorilla in search, they’re starting to loose credibility with their new ventures.

I haven’t even mentioned their “Project 10^100″ that they launched a few YEARS ago, in 2008.  Winners were supposed to be announced in 2009.  Then January 2010.  It’s now August of 2010 and they’re still soliciting proposals, have removed all deadline promises, and have simply listed future announcements as “coming soon.”   Another big PR hype that slowly rotted on the vine and died.

I’m not here to be a naysayer or beat up on Google.  I use Google.  I love Google.  I use Google Analytics for many of the web sites we design and develop for our customers at 401 Consulting, LLC.  I hope Google does well and is around for a very, very long time.  I’m just stepping back, as a business owner and tech industry CEO, and musing on the concept of sticking to one’s core competency.   I think it might do Google some good.

Uh oh…

Today Twitter has released their own official iPhone app.  It’s labeled version 3.0 because this is actually an updated version of the previously popular Tweetie app.  The Twitter juggernaut recently acquired Tweetie and the company behind it, taking over the app and re-branding it as the official Twitter app.   Since its debut, Tweetie had been $2.99 in the iTunes AppStore.  Twitter has now made it free for all users.

While this offers more opportunities for end users (and makes this popular app now free), I personally have serious reservations about this development!

As an independent software vendor (“ISV”) myself, I don’t read this headline as a good, consumer-friendly move.  Instead, I read it as an anti-competitive move.

One of the things that has helped Twitter explode in popularity has been it’s software interface/platform (it’s “API”), which lets 3rd party software products and web sites connect to the service and do useful things.  Websites can automatically pull twitter feeds – you see “my latest tweets” in sidebars on WordPress blogs all the time, for instance. This has given rise to a whole ecosystem of 3rd party software products and add-ons, ranging from mobile twitter apps like Twitteriffic (my personal favorite), Tweet Deck, EchoFon, and more, as well as web services such as TwitPic.com, UberTwitter and more.

Twitter execs, just last month, revealed that 75% of their traffic comes from outside of the Twitter.com site, through API calls.  They also quantified this: 3 billion API calls per day, every day, coming from 3rd party mobile devices, independent web sites, and so forth.

Read more…